Last modified by Danniar Firdausy on 2024/09/18 14:37

From version 4.1
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2022/08/29 14:50
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 5.1
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2022/08/29 14:52
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Content
... ... @@ -14,11 +14,11 @@
14 14  Auditability is defined as follows: A history trail that depicts who changed what at which moment in time containing an explanation of what has been changed
15 15  
16 16  * The key aspects are:
17 - * The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
18 - * Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
19 - * For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
20 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
21 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
17 + ** The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
18 + ** Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
19 + ** For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
20 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
21 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
22 22  
23 23  == 3. Making clear what you changed (auditability) ==
24 24  
... ... @@ -25,11 +25,11 @@
25 25  As you can imagine, there is a need to know what has changed when working with software tooling. By knowing you can assess the impact of your planned changes within the context of the integration data model. In this microlearning, we will look at what you can do to clarify what you changed within the eMagiz platform.
26 26  
27 27  * The key aspects are:
28 - * The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
29 - * Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
30 - * For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
31 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
32 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
28 + ** The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
29 + ** Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
30 + ** For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
31 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
32 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
33 33  
34 34  === 3.1 Versioning by users ===
35 35  
... ... @@ -67,11 +67,11 @@
67 67  == 5. Key takeaways ==
68 68  
69 69  * The key aspects are:
70 - * The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
71 - * Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
72 - * For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
73 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
74 - * eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
70 + ** The description is your way of communicating the history of the flow
71 + ** Using vague descriptions (or placing a dot as description) hurts the auditability
72 + ** For all things versioned in eMagiz it is crucial that you supply the correct description
73 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on Architectural overviews (Design and Deploy architecture) including a description
74 + ** eMagiz provides audit trails on message definitions and transformations including a description
75 75  
76 76  == 6. Suggested Additional Readings ==
77 77