Last modified by Danniar Firdausy on 2023/08/11 10:54
From version 24.1
edited by eMagiz
on 2022/06/09 11:01
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 4.1
edited by eMagiz
on 2022/05/17 09:09
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Determining Integration Pattern
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -WebHome
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.eMagiz
1 +XWiki.marijn
Content
... ... @@ -1,9 +1,16 @@
1 -{{container}}
2 -{{container layoutStyle="columns"}}
3 -(((
1 +{{html wiki="true"}}
2 +<div class="ez-academy">
3 + <div class="ez-academy_body">
4 +
5 +<div class="doc">
6 +
7 +
8 +
9 += Determining Integration Pattern =
10 +
4 4  In eMagiz, we differentiate between three "first-class" integration patterns. Each of these patterns is best suited for particular integration challenges. In this microlearning, we will see how to compare the three integration patterns to decide which pattern to choose.
5 5  
6 -Should you have any questions, please get in touch with [[academy@emagiz.com>>mailto:academy@emagiz.com]].
13 +Should you have any questions, please get in touch with academy@emagiz.com.
7 7  
8 8  * Last update: August 5th, 2021
9 9  * Required reading time: 7 minutes
... ... @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
38 38  
39 39  As stated above, there are three "first-class" integration patterns within eMagiz. Each of these patterns has a unique way of processing the data. In this microlearning, we will look at how to decide which pattern best fits your integration challenge. Before we do that, let us first quickly look at the three integration patterns. In the picture below, you see a visual representation of each of the three patterns.
40 40  
41 -[[image:Main.Images.Microlearning.WebHome@intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png]]
48 +<p align="center">[[image:intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png||]]</p>
42 42  
43 43  As you can see, each pattern works differently. If you want an in-depth introduction to messaging, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-messaging-introduction.md). If you want an in-depth introduction to event streaming, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-eventstreaming-event-streaming-introduction.md). If you want an in-depth introduction to API gateway, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-api-gateway-introduction.md).
44 44  
... ... @@ -85,6 +85,8 @@
85 85  
86 86  So that means that you might save money in the short with sticking what you know but could end up paying more due to (significantly) higher implementation costs. Another piece of the puzzle is the resource costs. For this aspect also the resource costs differ per integration pattern. Here we see that taking a messaging solution would incur the highest resource costs. API Gateway and Event Streaming roughly take up the same amount of resource costs. We want to note that a large portion of the resource costs for Event Streaming lies in storage. So when you can reduce that component, the Event Streaming option would become even more cost-friendly. Hopefully, this microlearning will help you to make the correct decision per integration question.
87 87  
95 +===== Practice =====
96 +
88 88  == 4. Assignment ==
89 89  
90 90  Reflect on the choices made within various projects and see if you would change the specific implementation with what you know now.
... ... @@ -106,7 +106,9 @@
106 106  
107 107  As this is a more theoretical microlearning, we have no video for this.
108 108  
109 -)))
118 +</div>
110 110  
111 -((({{toc/}}))){{/container}}
112 -{{/container}}
120 +</div>
121 +</div>
122 +
123 +{{/html}}
intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.marijn
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +68.3 KB
Content