Last modified by Danniar Firdausy on 2023/08/11 10:54
From version 25.1
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2022/08/23 09:39
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 21.2
edited by eMagiz
on 2022/06/08 12:30
Change comment: Update document after refactoring.

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -Determining Integration Pattern
1 +intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.ebakker
1 +XWiki.eMagiz
Default language
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -en
Content
... ... @@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
3 3  (((
4 4  In eMagiz, we differentiate between three "first-class" integration patterns. Each of these patterns is best suited for particular integration challenges. In this microlearning, we will see how to compare the three integration patterns to decide which pattern to choose.
5 5  
6 -Should you have any questions, please get in touch with [[academy@emagiz.com>>mailto:academy@emagiz.com]].
6 +Should you have any questions, please get in touch with academy@emagiz.com.
7 7  
8 +* Last update: August 5th, 2021
9 +* Required reading time: 7 minutes
10 +
8 8  == 1. Prerequisites ==
9 9  
10 10  * Basic knowledge of the eMagiz platform
... ... @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
20 20   * Each pattern has pros and cons
21 21   * Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
22 22  
26 +
27 +
23 23  == 3. Determining Integration Pattern ==
24 24  
25 25  In eMagiz, we differentiate between three "first-class" integration patterns. Each of these patterns is best suited for particular integration challenges. In this microlearning, we will see how to compare the three integration patterns to decide which pattern to choose.
... ... @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
80 80  
81 81  So that means that you might save money in the short with sticking what you know but could end up paying more due to (significantly) higher implementation costs. Another piece of the puzzle is the resource costs. For this aspect also the resource costs differ per integration pattern. Here we see that taking a messaging solution would incur the highest resource costs. API Gateway and Event Streaming roughly take up the same amount of resource costs. We want to note that a large portion of the resource costs for Event Streaming lies in storage. So when you can reduce that component, the Event Streaming option would become even more cost-friendly. Hopefully, this microlearning will help you to make the correct decision per integration question.
82 82  
88 +===== Practice =====
89 +
83 83  == 4. Assignment ==
84 84  
85 85  Reflect on the choices made within various projects and see if you would change the specific implementation with what you know now.
... ... @@ -91,6 +91,8 @@
91 91   * Each pattern has pros and cons
92 92   * Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
93 93  
101 +
102 +
94 94  == 6. Suggested Additional Readings ==
95 95  
96 96  If you are interested in this topic, please get in touch with academy@emagiz.com.
... ... @@ -97,7 +97,9 @@
97 97  
98 98  == 7. Silent demonstration video ==
99 99  
100 -As this is a more theoretical microlearning, we have no video for this.)))
109 +As this is a more theoretical microlearning, we have no video for this.
101 101  
111 +)))
112 +
102 102  ((({{toc/}}))){{/container}}
103 103  {{/container}}