Last modified by Danniar Firdausy on 2023/08/11 10:54

From version 27.1
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2022/08/23 09:51
Change comment: There is no comment for this version
To version 7.1
edited by eMagiz
on 2022/05/17 09:10
Change comment: There is no comment for this version

Summary

Details

Page properties
Title
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -Determining Integration Pattern
Parent
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -WebHome
Author
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1 -XWiki.ebakker
1 +XWiki.marijn
Default language
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1 -en
Content
... ... @@ -1,10 +1,20 @@
1 -{{container}}
2 -{{container layoutStyle="columns"}}
3 -(((
1 +{{html wiki="true"}}
2 +<div class="ez-academy">
3 + <div class="ez-academy_body">
4 +
5 +<div class="doc">
6 +
7 +
8 +
9 += Determining Integration Pattern =
10 +
4 4  In eMagiz, we differentiate between three "first-class" integration patterns. Each of these patterns is best suited for particular integration challenges. In this microlearning, we will see how to compare the three integration patterns to decide which pattern to choose.
5 5  
6 -Should you have any questions, please get in touch with [[academy@emagiz.com>>mailto:academy@emagiz.com]].
13 +Should you have any questions, please get in touch with academy@emagiz.com.
7 7  
15 +* Last update: August 5th, 2021
16 +* Required reading time: 7 minutes
17 +
8 8  == 1. Prerequisites ==
9 9  
10 10  * Basic knowledge of the eMagiz platform
... ... @@ -16,10 +16,12 @@
16 16  The focal point of this microlearning will be to figure out how you can best decide between the various "first-class" integration patterns.
17 17  
18 18  * The key aspects are:
19 - ** The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
20 - ** Each pattern has pros and cons
21 - ** Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
29 + * The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
30 + * Each pattern has pros and cons
31 + * Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
22 22  
33 +
34 +
23 23  == 3. Determining Integration Pattern ==
24 24  
25 25  In eMagiz, we differentiate between three "first-class" integration patterns. Each of these patterns is best suited for particular integration challenges. In this microlearning, we will see how to compare the three integration patterns to decide which pattern to choose.
... ... @@ -27,15 +27,15 @@
27 27  The focal point of this microlearning will be to figure out how you can best decide between the various "first-class" integration patterns.
28 28  
29 29  * The key aspects are:
30 - ** The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
31 - ** Each pattern has pros and cons
32 - ** Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
42 + * The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
43 + * Each pattern has pros and cons
44 + * Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
33 33  
34 34  As stated above, there are three "first-class" integration patterns within eMagiz. Each of these patterns has a unique way of processing the data. In this microlearning, we will look at how to decide which pattern best fits your integration challenge. Before we do that, let us first quickly look at the three integration patterns. In the picture below, you see a visual representation of each of the three patterns.
35 35  
36 -[[image:Main.Images.Microlearning.WebHome@intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png]]
48 +<p align="center">[[image:intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png||]]</p>
37 37  
38 -As you can see, each pattern works differently. If you want an in-depth introduction to messaging, please check out this [[microlearning>>doc:Main.eMagiz Academy.Microlearnings.Crash Course.Crash Course Messaging.crashcourse-messaging-introduction.WebHome||target="blank"]]. If you want an in-depth introduction to event streaming, please check out this [[microlearning>>doc:Main.eMagiz Academy.Microlearnings.Crash Course.Crash Course Event Streaming.crashcourse-eventstreaming-event-streaming-introduction.WebHome||target="blank"]]. If you want an in-depth introduction to API gateway, please check out this [[microlearning>>doc:Main.eMagiz Academy.Microlearnings.Crash Course.Crash Course API Gateway.crashcourse-api-gateway-introduction.WebHome||target="blank"]].
50 +As you can see, each pattern works differently. If you want an in-depth introduction to messaging, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-messaging-introduction.md). If you want an in-depth introduction to event streaming, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-eventstreaming-event-streaming-introduction.md). If you want an in-depth introduction to API gateway, please check out this [microlearning](crashcourse-api-gateway-introduction.md).
39 39  
40 40  Because each pattern works differently, each pattern has its pros and its cons. Depending on your specific use case, the balance between the pros and cons of one of the patterns will favor the pros. As a result, you should choose that option. But then, you ask, on what grounds should I make the decision? The answer is a series of checks and balances that look both at the business and technical aspects.
41 41  
... ... @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
80 80  
81 81  So that means that you might save money in the short with sticking what you know but could end up paying more due to (significantly) higher implementation costs. Another piece of the puzzle is the resource costs. For this aspect also the resource costs differ per integration pattern. Here we see that taking a messaging solution would incur the highest resource costs. API Gateway and Event Streaming roughly take up the same amount of resource costs. We want to note that a large portion of the resource costs for Event Streaming lies in storage. So when you can reduce that component, the Event Streaming option would become even more cost-friendly. Hopefully, this microlearning will help you to make the correct decision per integration question.
82 82  
95 +===== Practice =====
96 +
83 83  == 4. Assignment ==
84 84  
85 85  Reflect on the choices made within various projects and see if you would change the specific implementation with what you know now.
... ... @@ -87,10 +87,12 @@
87 87  == 5. Key takeaways ==
88 88  
89 89  * The key aspects are:
90 - ** The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
91 - ** Each pattern has pros and cons
92 - ** Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
104 + * The three "first-class" patterns are messaging, event streaming, and API gateway
105 + * Each pattern has pros and cons
106 + * Decide which pattern suits best based on business and technical checks and balances
93 93  
108 +
109 +
94 94  == 6. Suggested Additional Readings ==
95 95  
96 96  If you are interested in this topic, please get in touch with academy@emagiz.com.
... ... @@ -97,7 +97,11 @@
97 97  
98 98  == 7. Silent demonstration video ==
99 99  
100 -As this is a more theoretical microlearning, we have no video for this.)))
116 +As this is a more theoretical microlearning, we have no video for this.
101 101  
102 -((({{toc/}}))){{/container}}
103 -{{/container}}
118 +</div>
119 +
120 +</div>
121 +</div>
122 +
123 +{{/html}}
intermediate-discover-your-integration-landscape-determining-integration-pattern--the-three-patterns-visualized.png
Author
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +XWiki.marijn
Size
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
1 +68.3 KB
Content