Changes for page Multipart form-data
Last modified by Erik Bakker on 2024/06/17 11:39
From version 17.2
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2022/08/05 13:58
on 2022/08/05 13:58
Change comment:
Update document after refactoring.
To version 21.1
edited by Erik Bakker
on 2023/01/23 13:12
on 2023/01/23 13:12
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (3 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 - expert-data-handling-multipart-form-data1 +Multipart form-data - Default language
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -en - Content
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ 1 1 {{container}}{{container layoutStyle="columns"}}((( 2 - When yourintegrationlandscape growsthrough time,youmightdecidetosplit functionalbusinessprocessesinto multipleeMagizmodels.Inthose cases,thequestion ofconnectingthesemodelseasily, stable,andsecurely could arise.This microlearning willfocus onthatquestion andprovideananswerbased on ourvision andbestpracticeswhendealingwiththeplatform.2 +Sometimes when you call an external REST endpoint, they require you to send meta information and one or more "attachments" in one call to the REST endpoint. To make this possible, you need to send the information with the contentType called multipart/form-data. In this microlearning, we will discuss how you can configure a valid message within the eMagiz platform that allows you to send out messages with this contentType and have them accepted by the endpoint in question. 3 3 4 4 Should you have any questions, please get in touch with [[academy@emagiz.com>>mailto:academy@emagiz.com]]. 5 5 ... ... @@ -9,50 +9,73 @@ 9 9 10 10 == 2. Key concepts == 11 11 12 -This microlearning focuses on co mmunicationbetweentwoeMagizmodels. Whencommunicating toanyexternal party(fromtheviewof aspecificmodel),youshouldalways considerthefollowing:12 +This microlearning focuses on configuring a multipart/form-data message within eMagiz to ensure it is sent correctly to an endpoint. 13 13 14 -* Security 15 -* Loose coupling 16 -* Maintainability 17 -* Clarity 14 +Key aspects are: 18 18 19 -== 3. Communication between models == 16 +* Defining the boundary that separates the parts of the message 17 +* Defining the content types of each part of the message 18 +* Construction of the complete message according to the specification 20 20 21 - Inalow-code platform like eMagiz, youwant to prevent using custom scripting as much as possible. However, sometimes inpractice, you encountersituationsthat cannot be realized with the standard toolbox provided within the platform. As a result, we offer the option to use a Groovy script in these situations to achieve thedesired solution. In this microlearning, we will look atwhere you canuse a Groovy script and discuss the key considerations when implementing a Groovy script within your model.20 +== 3. Multipart form-data == 22 22 23 - Mostusers wouldthinkthatcommunicationviaqueuestoconnecttwoseparate eMagizmodelsisa bright idea.However,thisissomethingthatwe donotencourage.We discourage thisforseveralpracticaland technicalreasonsalike.22 +Sometimes when you call an external REST endpoint, they require you to send meta information and one or more "attachments" in one call to the REST endpoint. To make this possible, you need to send the information with the contentType called multipart/form-data. In this microlearning, we will discuss how you can configure a valid message within the eMagiz platform that allows you to send out messages with this contentType and have them accepted by the endpoint in question. 24 24 25 - When looking at the practical side of things getting it configured correctlyis time-consumingand an error-prone action (asis evident by the question). Furthermore, it can lead to unexpectedsituationswhere you make a typo to listen to a queue on which no messages areprovided. This queue will, however, be registered on the JMS level (when you activate the flow in question with the custom configuration), which can lead to confusing queue statistics and even more troublesome false-positive alerting based on missing queue metrics or missing consumers.24 +Key aspects are: 26 26 27 -On top of that, when you allow one model to write and read from queues registered in another model, maintaining both models will become very complex. This holds for the ones working on the project at the moment but also for those working on it at a later stage and does that need to provide (incidental) support on the environments. 26 +* Defining the boundary that separates the parts of the message 27 +* Defining the content types of each part of the message 28 +* Construction of the complete message according to the specification 28 28 29 - Anotherpracticalreason fornot wanting this is that wedo notactively support this usecase fromMagiz. Thismeansthat whenwe update our technical infrastructure, we will not consider this scenario. This could lead to additional work in the future and reduced stability of your solution.30 +=== 3.1 Prepare the message === 30 30 31 - Fromthetechnicalpoint ofview,theconsequence ofthisconstructionishatbothmodels needtoknoweach othercertificatesand credentials,which aretconsideredsecure.On topofthat,because you,theoretically,can exchangedata from anyqueuetoanyqueue,youcouldcreatesituationinwhichupdatesin onemodeltriggerchangesintheothermodel (i.e.,whenusingthe samedatamodel)thatareunexpected(andfranklyunwanted).32 +To construct the message, several steps are needed to make it work. Luckily, most of the steps necessary have to do with concepts we have already discussed in previous microlearnings. As you can imagine, based on what multipart/form-data entails, we need a way to both store the meta information and the file(s) we want to send to the external party. For example, put the metadata in one (or multiple) header(s) and use the file content as a payload. This you can achieve with a header enricher and standard transformer. 32 32 33 -We advise using functionality that makes it explicit that both models function independently of each other. From eMagiz, we consider two valid alternatives for this: 34 -- Using a web service as a communication layer between the two models. This web service can be REST or SOAP and has been implemented before 35 -- Using the Event Streaming functionality of eMagiz to write and read from topics. 34 +Once the file content is your payload, you must ensure that the data is "raw." So when you have a base64 encoded string, you should decode it before sending it to the endpoint. 36 36 37 - Both alternativeshavethebenefitthatthesecurity canbetight andexplicit (i.e., only modelA can write/postdata to model B). Furthermore, managing thesolution becomes muchasieras it uses the standard functionality withinhe platform.Therefore,wehaveno plans to support this approach in theproduct.36 +On top of that, we need to define the contentType header. 38 38 38 +[[image:Main.Images.Microlearning.WebHome@expert-data-handling-multipart-form-data--content-type-header-config.png]] 39 + 40 +=== 3.2 Construct the message === 41 + 42 +After you have set the stage, you can use a standard transformer component to build your message correctly. To create it correctly, you need to take the following into account: 43 + 44 +* Each part of the message needs to be separated by a boundary 45 +* The message needs to start with a boundary and finish with a boundary 46 +* Line breaks are needed to differentiate between the boundary and the text content 47 +* No line break is needed when the content is not text-based 48 + 49 +Given all this, you can write the following SpEL expression that will yield a desirable output: 50 + 51 +{{code}}'${multi-part-form-data.data-handling.boundary}' + headers.metaInfo + T(com.emagiz.util.Newline).CRLF.characters + '${multi-part-form-data.data-handling.boundary}' + T(com.emagiz.util.Newline).CRLF.characters + 'Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="' + headers.filename + '"' + T(com.emagiz.util.Newline).CRLF.characters + 'Content-Type: application/pdf' + T(com.emagiz.util.Newline).CRLF.characters + T(com.emagiz.util.Newline).CRLF.characters + payload + '${multi-part-form-data.data-handling.boundary}'{{/code}} 52 + 53 +Putting this in a standard transformation gives you the following solution in the flow. 54 + 55 +[[image:Main.Images.Microlearning.WebHome@expert-data-handling-multipart-form-data--standard-transformer-config.png]] 56 + 57 +=== 3.3 Calling the endpoint === 58 + 59 +Now that we have constructed our message correctly, the last thing to do is call the endpoint in question. Since we have prepared our message and accurately defined our contentType calling the endpoint does not require any additional configurations compared to what you are already used to when dealing with REST endpoints. 60 + 39 39 == 4. Assignment == 40 40 41 - Considerwhat yourcriteriaarewhencommunicatingbetweenmodels andcomparethem toourcriteria.63 +Try to see whether you can construct the flow so that it outputs a valid multipart/form-data message. 42 42 This assignment can be completed with the help of the (Academy) project you created/used in the previous assignment. 43 43 44 44 == 5. Key takeaways == 45 45 46 -* Consider the following when communication between two models 47 -** Security 48 -** Loose coupling 49 -** Maintainability 50 -** Clarity 68 +* Make sure to define the boundary that separates the parts of the message 69 +* Make sure to define the content types of each part of the message 70 +* Make sure to define the content type that matches the specification for multipart/form-data 71 +* Construct the complete message according to the specification 51 51 52 52 == 6. Suggested Additional Readings == 53 53 54 -If you are interested in this topic a nd want moreinformation,pleaseconsultus at[[productmanagement@emagiz.com>>mailto:productmanagement@emagiz.com]]75 +If you are interested in this topic, please read the help texts on the platform and read the following link: 55 55 77 +* [[Multipart form-data explained>>https://www.sobyte.net/post/2021-12/learn-about-http-multipart-form-data/||target="blank"]] 78 + 56 56 == 7. Silent demonstration video == 57 57 58 58 As this is more of theoretical microlearning, there is no video accompanying the microlearning.)))((({{toc/}}))){{/container}}{{/container}}